The page that keeps you up to date with the latest developments concerning the Carlyon Bay controversy.
OCTOBER 2011: CBW EXCLUDED FROM DEVELOPER LIAISON MEETINGS
Carlyon Bay Watch has not been invited to attend liaison meetings with local residents which the developer CEG is obliged to set up under the terms of its planning consent. The meetings are supposed to be a forum for discussion about the details of the development on the Carlyon Bay beaches and a way of keeping locals informed and of hearing their concerns. CBW had been involved with the meetings which took place before planning permission was granted - but it seems that was just to make a good impression at a time when the development could have been rejected. Now they have their permission they don't seem to be much concerned what local residents think any more or what their concerns are.
Carlyon Parish Council, which is invited to the meetings together with nearby parish and town councils, has expressed its "outrage" at the exclusion of CBW, and is asking Cornwall Council officers to persuade the developer to reconsider.
28th JULY 2011: PUBLIC INQUIRY RULED OUT BY SECRETARY OF STATE
There will be no public inquiry into the latest planning application for the beaches at Carlyon Bay, says the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles. The plans had been referred to him because they are contrary to the local development plan and existing adopted policies, as admitted by Cornwall Council planning officers.
But this seems to have been ignored by the Secretary of State who apparently said there was no conflict with national policies and the government was committed to giving more power to local councils to determine local planning applications. But the wishes of hundreds of those most affected by this massive proposal have been completely ignored by this decision. A petition with 400 signatures called for a smaller development, a substantial majority of people in a survey by local councillor John Oxenham wanted a smaller scheme, so did those in a survey by another local Councillor, Steve Double. Carlyon Parish Council, representing 800 households in Carlyon Bay and Tregehen, unanimously opposed the scheme because it was too big.
CARLYON BAY WATCH COMMENT
""Today, we mourn the passing of “Localism”, still-born into the lap of Minister Pickles, who obviously doesn’t carry very well, because we’re still mourning the recent death of St.Dennis, fatally infected by a deadly Incineration. Just how local was “Localism” ? In both of these cases, Localism was to have been the pride and joy of the local Parishes, and you cannot get much more local than that.
However, like so much of politics today, electoral promises quickly evaporate once the vote is in the ballot-box, and money will often crush the democratic process to death.
At Carlyon Bay, we have fought continually since 2004 for an environmentally-sensitive development restricted to the existing brownfield site of the old Coliseum. However, when nearly £6 million pounds was proffered by the developer to the ‘midwife’, Cornwall Council conveniently chose to set aside almost all of its Planning principles to get its hands on the money. Put another way, this appears to show that if you’ve got enough money, you can buy virtually any Planning Consent you want.
Despite ultimate defeat, our Carlyonbaywatch campaign did succeed in compelling first Restormel Borough and then Cornwall Council to ensure that our long Enforcement Order battle succeeded, so that the completely unauthorised sea defences were 90% removed, and the beaches of Carlyon Bay were restored to something of their earlier state. Here again, the facts demonstrate that, if you are big enough, you can remain outside the effects of planning enforcement legislation unless local people are able literally to drive the authorities into action. Sadly however (thanks again, Mr. Pickles) the sea wall will probably soon be back. Soon after that, we shall discover the actual intention of this developer about what is to be built behind it. We shall doubtless learn that ‘hybrid’ is as ‘hybrid’ does, when what we have already described as a blank cheque will be presented into the hands of Cornwall’s Planning elite.
Costa del Carlyon will provide a beacon for developers all over the UK and beyond, for they now have ministerial proof that the beautiful face of Cornwall is no longer immune to their concrete carbuncles, and that National and regional planning policies designed to protect our natural environment are no longer effective against their depredations.To all of our supporters, we must say a very big “thanks ever”, we are indeed sorry that common sense and reason would not prevail, despite our unsparing efforts over so many long years. We are left with the unlikely hope that our worst predictions about the consequences of this momentous decision may yet be avoided."
The developers CEG say details of form and design now have to be worked out before they are submitted for approval - as CBW have repeatedly said, we don't yet know what our planners have voted for and neither do they. CEB also says it "hopes" to start construction next year.
Meanwhile local footpath campaigners are waiting for a decision from Cornwall Council on their application for the continuation of the public right of way (down Beach Road and across the front of the old Coliseum building) to the foreshore. This would mean public access to the beach as of right rather than by permission of the developer or any future owners.
So once again, we wait and see.
30TH JUNE 2011: SCHEME GIVEN GO AHEAD BY COUNCIL PLANNERS
The latest planning application for the Carlyon Bay beaches is to be referred to the Secretary of State after being given the go ahead by Cornwall Council.
The Council's Strategic Planning Committee approved the plans at a meeting on 30th June. Councillors voted for the application after a report by planning officers' claimed that the economic benefits and the existence of the extant permission (which CBW says is discredited and should be ignored as a consideration) outweigh the harm. But the report admits that the plans are located in the coastal zone, outside the development envelope of St Austell, the site is not in the Development Plan and therefore the development is contrary to existing adopted policies and represents a Departure from the Development Plan. (All these points have been made time and again by Carlyon Bay Watch - as you can read here.)
For these reasons a decison will have to be made by the Secretary of State.
CARLYON BAY WATCH COMMENT
"We are dismayed at the lack of attention given to the overwhelming local objection to this development. We feel that by ignoring popular opinion and planning policy of building in coastal areas that Cornwall Council has opened up a floodgate to any owner of a beach in Cornwall to have it fully developed for residential/holiday apartments. It is like selling off the crown jewels simply to pay for the bills of today whilst ignoring the long term benefits of Cornwall's assets namely its beautiful coastline and beaches. Are we expected to welcome a massive sea wall and another 511 holiday homes spread across Sennen Cove, St Ives bay, Portreath?
Cornwall you have been put on notice that your elected representatives are selling off your county by the pound.
We have already put our case before the National Planning Case Unit for this matter to be examined in greater detail by the Government as we consider it raises issues of national importance. We await their decision."
The unauthorised line of shuttering is gone following council enforcement action.
Meanwhile, the ugly and unauthorised line of shuttering which has blighted the beaches since 2004 has mostly been removed three-and-a-half years after an enforcement notice was served by Restormel Borough Council. All, that is, except for a section around the information office which CEG now say they want to keep in place for, it seems, an undefined period of time. They have applied for retrospective planning permission - but why should they be allowed it when the Enforcement Notice called for the removal of the shuttering in its entirety, not just part of it as the developer deems convenient.
The shuttering was constructed by the developer, without planning permission, as part of the sea defence scheme rejected after the 2006 Public Inquiry. Enforcement action was taken with a deadline of December 2010 which was then extended to February 2011. Now, June, the main body of shuttering has gone but as the developer chose to completely ignore planning regulations there is no reason to allow permission to retain part of what is an unauthorised structure. There is an easy alternative to move the temporary information centre elsewhere on this site.
31st MAY 2011: PUBLIC MEETING ON BEACH DEVELOPMENT
Members of Cornwall Council's Strategic Planning Committee heard the views of members of the public about the beach development at a public meeting at the One Stop Shop in St Austell.
Carlyon Bay Watch had already been banned from speaking at the meeting on the grounds that our views were already known by the Council - even so, of those who were allowed to give the committee their views, many people presented strongly held reasons for opposing this monstrous development. Unsurprisingly, almost all of the people who spoke in support of the development were businessmen and people with a vested interest in seeing it go ahead.
19th MAY 2011: PARISH COUNCIL REJECTS BEACH DEVELOPMENT
Carlyon Parish Council, which represents more than two thousand people in Carlyon Bay and Tregrehan, has unanimously rejected the beach development application. At its monthly meeting on 17th May held at Charlestown School, councillors discussed their concerns about the development. One councillor said he was personally in favour of the application but was mindful of the views of his constituents, most of whom were against it. Another raised the views expressed in a questionnaire sent to every household asking whether people wanted more housing in the parish - more than 80% said no. A constant concern every time the council discussed the development over the months has been the projected increase in traffic and councillors felt the planning application still does not address the problem adequately. Another recurring concern has been public access and the council felt that it would be too easy for the public to be prevented from getting onto the beaches at the whim of the developer.
In a unanimous vote, the council said it objected to the application in its present form for the following reasons: (a) the size of the proposal on a Cornish beach (b) the access arrangements for the general public (c) the lack of a workable traffic plan d) the setting of a powerful planning precedent"
This council represents the 800 households which will feel the impact of this development the most and its concerns mirror many of those Carlyon Bay Watch have been stating for many years about this massive development.
The pilings are being lifted one at a time from the line along the beach at Crinnis
Seven years after the ugly line of metal pilings and rock armour were erected without planning permission across Crinnis and Shorthorn beaches, work has finally begun to remove it.
The area around the Sandy River was mostly cleared last year, allowing easier access to Shorthorn and Polgaver beaches. Now work has started on the Crinnis section, although the pilings will be left in front of the information centre for the time being.
Special machinery is grabbing the pilings one at a time and pulling them out of the ground. After only a day's work the shoreline can once again be seen through a hole in the shuttering.
The order to remove the wall was given in 2007 with a deadline of December 2010.
For the first time in seven years the shoreline emerges from behind the wall
But the developers have delayed and delayed and then used the excuse of a new planning application to keep it beyond the deadline. But, it seems, after pressure from CBW, local residents and councillors, behind-the-scenes negotiations by Cornwall Council officers have led to a start being made before a decision has been taken on the planning application. The developers say they hope the work will be finished in time for the summer holiday season. Wire mesh will be used to fence off the parts of the beaches made dangerous by the demolition operation. The line of shuttering was built into the tidal zone, which has meant that, since 2004, people have not been able to walk from one end of the beaches to the other at high tide (and at times of spring tides a couple of hours either side of high tide).
Meanwhile, CBW has submitted a 250 page document to Cornwall Council planners detailing our objections to this massive development. The document can be viewed by going to the CBW Submission page.
6th APRIL 2011: PARISH COUNCILS QUESTION DEVELOPERS
A joint meeting of Carlyon and St Austell Bay parish councils heard a presentation on the Beach development by CEG. Councillors asked questions about the development and members of the public had a chance to do the same.
Councillors from St Austell Bay expressed their serious concerns about traffic along Beach Road, Church Road and Charlestown Road with its impact on Charlestown Primary and Penrice Schools as well as St Paul's Church. One described the several years of disturbance and inconvenience because of new developments at Duporth and the old foundry site. There was a lot of scepticism from members of the public about whether the CEG travel plan would deliver the sort of traffic patterns the developer is predicting. The serious congestion on the A390 along the Holmbush corridor was raised as was the problem faced by Tregehan residents trying to enter the A390.
Another councillor raised the question of the design of the development saying he couldn't see what was Cornish about it and also whether the developers had considered reducing the size of the scheme.
22nd MARCH 2011: CARLYON BAY WATCH NEWSLETTER In response to the submission of a new planning application CBW has distributed the following newsletter to all the residents of Carlyon Bay and to some of the surrounding areas.
SAY "NO" TO A NEW TOWN HERE Five hundred new homes, more than 1,000 people, sheltering behind a concrete wall on our beaches. This is what developers want to do to Carlyon Bay.
New plans are now with Cornwall Council's planners for consideration. Carlyon Bay Watch believes the development is still too big - a view shared by most local residents and by many local County and Parish Councillors. We have consistently sought to restrict any development to the only previously developed part of the beaches - the "footprint" of the old Cornwall Coliseum and related buildings on part of Crinnis. This scheme wants to concrete over not only Crinnis and Shorthorn beaches but even has designs on Polgaver, which more than 80% of residents say they want left to nature.
But the developer refuses to reduce the size of the development. We are still faced with more than 500 new dwellings on our local beaches - doubling the population of Carlyon Bay at a stroke and putting an intolerable burden on our essential services. We do not need a new town on a beach. We do not need the increased pressure on our roads, schools and health service just to satisfy a developer's need to make a profit. We believe the idea of building holiday homes, let alone residential units, on any beach is madness in the light of climate change and steadily rising sea levels - in fact such developments fly in the face of current national policies.
This is a "hybrid" application which only seeks outline planning permission for the area behind the sea defences. It provides no detail as to how it will squeeze 511 homes onto the beaches - if the developers are given outline planning consent it would effectively give them a "blank cheque". Any designs seen so far in the so-called consultation exercise might bear no relation to the final plans and with Polgaver included in any outline permission it's likely that the last remaining natural area on Carlyon Bay will be lost.
The impact a development of this size will have on everyone in the area and others who enjoy our beaches cannot be emphasised enough. This is a coastal zone which should be protected as one of Cornwall's greatest assets and the proposal would remove a significant part of Carlyon Bay's natural open spaces. It is disingenuous of the developer to assure us that access will be maintained whilst as the same time severely restricting the number of public car parking spaces. This deliberate policy will be, by design, the most effective way of restricting public access to the beaches.
A mass of buildings up to the height of the cliffs would remove much of the beaches as we know them and obliterate views of the shoreline and coastline, which is flanked by Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It amounts to the destruction of that natural beauty which millions of people come to Cornwall to enjoy. Once one developer is allowed to build on a Cornish beach others are bound to follow.
Make sure your voice is heard and your views are considered by the decision-makers of Cornwall Council. This is your only chance to be heard and time is limited.
The plans are available at the Council offices in Penwinnick Road, St Austell or on the Council's website: http://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/online-applications. Once there enter the Planning Number PA11/01331. You can email your comments to planning.central2@cornwall.gov.uk Or write - quoting the Planning Number - to: Paul Banks, Planning and Regeneration Service, Cornwall Council, 39 Penwinnick Road, St Austell, Cornwall, PL25 5DR. Remember, time is short, but do send in your views on this major plan not only to the Council Planners but also to your elected County and Parish councillors.
If you live in Carlyon Parish they are: Cllr John Oxenham (Cornwall Council): joxenham@cornwall.gov.uk Cllr John Hermes, chairman, Carlyon Parish Council: j.hermes@tiscali.co.uk
The developers behind the proposed Beach complex have finally submitted their new planning application to Cornwall Council.
It's a "hybrid" application, that is plans for the sea defences are set out in detail but the area behind the defences are an outline application. The developers keep saying they won't consider anything less than the complex of 511 homes and leisure facilities they already have a 21-year-old permission for, but exactly how they will be distributed and in what style we don't know.
If the developers are given outline planning consent it would effectively give them a "blank cheque". Any designs seen so far in the so-called consultation exercise might bear no relation to the final plans. Also, Polgaver is included in the outline permission and so it's likely the last remaining natural area on Carlyon Bay will be lost - against the clearly expressed wishes of more than 80% of local residents.
28th JANUARY 2011: LOOSE PIPES SPARK COASTGUARD ALERT
"Sand" has been scoured away exposing drainage pipes - one was later washed out to sea
A section of pipeline has been washed off the beach at Carlyon Bay and out to sea, sparking an alert to shipping by the coastguard. The pipeline is thought to drain water from behind the steel shuttering into the Sandy River. Local walkers and fishermen noticed sections were coming loose earlier this week and on Thursday a section was washed out and blown westwards towards Charlestown by a strong easterly breeze. Rather belatedly security guards on the beach were told to try to recover the pipes still onshore, but why wasn't something done before one section floated off to pose a danger to shipping? The pipeline is buried under the steel shuttering which was erected without permission and is still there despite an enforcement notice which ordered its removal by 8th December 2010.
13th JANUARY 2011: RESIDENTIAL BOMBSHELL
After months and months of conflicting and misleading pronouncements from the developers of the proposed Beach complex it has just emerged that they will be applying - in their planning application due to be submitted by the end of the month - for 100% residential occupancy. This follows previous announcements indicating they were looking at residential rates ranging from 10%, through 25%, then 50%, back to 25% and now for the whole complex to be deemed residential. It would appear that CEG, the developers, have been given help in reaching this view by our Council's planning officers. It would mean huge advantages to CEG with the removal of the restriction for only 11 months occupancy of holiday dwellings with very little - if any - added benefit to the community living outside the Beach site. It is worth remembering that the original consent had no permanent residency. For further background see below under 21st OCTOBER 2010: HALF BEACH UNITS TO BE RESIDENTIAL. Even that headline now appears to be ironic. It is worth remembering that this could increase the population of Carlyon Bay (currently around 600 households) by well over 50% with all the implications for infrastructure requirements including schooling, health care and transport.
5th JANUARY 2011: CAR PARK PLANS SUBMITTED
Plans have been submitted to Cornwall Council for the resurfacing and upgrading of the car park off Beach Road which will be the only one servicing any development on the Carlyon Bay beaches. Bays will be marked out providing parking spaces for only 147 cars. Inevitably the overspill will affect a wide area of Carlyon Bay and neither the developers nor the Council seems to have any answers as yet to the problem. The developers also want to move the information office from the beach area up to the top car park and are applying for permission to keep it there for up to seven years. This application is the beginning of the process - applications are expected to be made shortly for the retention of the unauthorised steel shuttering and rock armour pending the outcome of a new planning application for the whole site, also expected soon
3rd NOVEMBER 2010: 'HANDS OFF POLGAVER' SAY RESIDENTS
Plans by the developers to put Polgaver beach to "community use" with tennis courts, play areas etc. have been overwhelmingly rejected by local residents. In the response to the questionnaire sent out by John Oxenham, the Cornwall Councillor for St Austell Bay, 80.8 percent wanted Polgaver to be left to nature. The reasons given for liking the beaches at Carlyon Bay were overwhelmingly because they are (or were) beautiful, local, offer good swimming and had easy access.
As the letter from Peter Browning points out below, most people agree with Carlyon Bay Watch that the proposed development is too large and half the respondents want no development on Shorthorn beach.
Most have major concerns at the impact traffic generated will have on neighbouring roads, both during and after the construction period. As Councillor Oxenham says: "Although the developer states that alternative traffic solutions will be introduced to minimise the impact, we have yet to see any details. In the absence of viable alternatives to car use, it would appear that most residents fear the worst for our local roads."
Nearly 70 percent of respondents were worried about the available car parking - particularly for local residents and disabled and older people who cannot negotiate the steps to the beach area from the upper car park.
Letter to Cornish Guardian from Peter Browning for Carlyon Bay Watch
"May we be permitted to comment upon the report on page 3 of the St Austell Guardian last week, titled "Survey on beach plan gets mixed response". We first reiterate that Carlyon Bay Watch has consistently sought an environmentally sustainable development, restricted to the brownfield Coliseum site.
From your report, it is clear that the majority are still with us and set against the wholesale destruction of the Carlyon Bay beach with a truly massive 511 dwellings, equalling Mevagissey town, all stuck upon St Austell Bay's best beach. We are very well aware of the need for great care in the drafting of survey questions correctly, so that we had tried to assist in the design and distribution of this survey; but, regrettably, we were not wanted. Accordingly, a more definitive survey was not possible.
However, by any fair interpretation of your published results, the respondent numbers were as follows: 87 respondents felt the development was unacceptable; 44 felt the development was acceptable; 37 respondents felt the development was acceptable with reservations; 54 felt it was acceptable with significant reservations.
This clearly proves that less than 20 percent of all respondents gave unqualified support to the proposals and more than 80 percent did not. Even then, had these 222 respondents all been made fully aware of the very serious traffic implications which would result from this development, their reservations may well have been even more pronounced and even more closely matched to our well-known position. We are grateful for the opportunity, through your columns, to complete the record."
27th OCTOBER 2010: WHAT'S IN A SURVEY?
The results of the survey into the Beach proposals conducted by county councillor John Oxenham have just been released. From over 200 respondents 87 felt that development on the site was not acceptable, against 44 who thought it was. 37 others felt the development was OK but had reservations and 54 thought it was acceptable but they had significant reservations.
While most respondents felt there should be some development a sizeable proportion felt the project was too large and about half didn't want to see any development on Shorthorn, limiting new buildings to the brownfield site of the old Coliseum complex on Crinnis. Worries were also expressed about traffic problems during and after construction and about the apparent shortage of parking. AMAZINGLY the development director for the project, Jon Kenny, has stated that CEG, the development group, was pleased that the survey indicated general support for the project! How he can come to this conclusion is a mystery in light of the fact that over 64% of the respondents had serious criticisms of the project and another 17% had concerns about aspects of it. Fewer than 20% expressed a view in favour of the yet-to-be published plan. Mr. Kenny is quoted as saying that he is very conscious of the fact that areas of concern have been highlighted but seems unwilling to take on board the main result of this independent survey - a large majority of the respondents feel that the development is just too big and is not acceptable.
Meanwhile what is described by CEG as 'public consultation' still goes on. Given CEG's reaction to this survey the question must be left in the mind as to whether public consultation means what it used to mean or does it now mean a developer hears only what they want to hear?